STANLEY B. THOMAN AND NORMAN JACKSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARTNERS D/B/A THOMAN-JACKSON CONSTRUCTION A/K/A JACKSON-THOMAN CONSTRUCTION, APPELLANTS,
v.
TIMMOTHY ASHLEY, A/K/A TIMMOTHY SINDELL, A MINOR, BY HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ETHEL ASHLEY SINDELL, ET AL., APPELLEES
STANLEY B. THOMAN AND NORMAN JACKSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARTNERS D/B/A THOMAN-JACKSON CONSTRUCTION A/K/A JACKSON-THOMAN CONSTRUCTION, APPELLANTS,
TIMMOTHY ASHLEY, A/K/A TIMMOTHY SINDELL, A MINOR, BY HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ETHEL ASHLEY SINDELL, ET AL., APPELLEES
185 So. 2d 201
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1966)
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Cook v. Lichtblau, Fla. App.1965, 176 So.2d 523 and Continental Aviation Corp. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Fla.1966, 183 So.2d 200.
SMITH, C. J., and ANDREWS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cook v. Lichtblau, 176 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Cont'l Aviation Corp. v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 183 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 1966)