DEVANEY

v.

COCHRAN, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS OF FLORIDA; AND BYRD V. WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Citator

Cited By

• Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (U.S. 1961)
  …the complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 272 F. 2d 365, relying on its earlier decision, Stift v. Lynch, 267 F. 2d 237. The case is here on a writ of certiorari which we granted because of a seeming conflict of that ruling with our prior cases. 362 U. S. 926. I. Petitioners claim that the invasion of their home and the subsequent search without a warrant and the arrest and detention of Mr. Monroe without a warrant and without arraignment constituted a deprivation of their “rights, privileges, or immun…
• Waterman S.S. Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc., 364 U.S. 421 (U.S. 1960)
  …ls for the Third Circuit affirmed in an en banc decision, three judges dissenting.2 Certiorari was granted to consider whether in a situation such as this the absence of a contractual relationship between the parties is fatal to the indemnity claim. 362 U. S. 926. In Ryan Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Corp., 350 U. S. 124, it was established that a stevedoring contractor who enters into a service agreement with a shipowner is liable to indemnify the owner for damages sustained as a result of the stevedore’s breach of…
• Wilkinson v. United States, 365 U.S. 399 (U.S. 1961)
  …ies at a hearing in Atlanta, [*401] Georgia, on July 30, 1958.1 His conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, which held that our decision in Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U. S. 109, was “controlling.” 272 F. 2d 783. We granted certiorari, 362 U. S. 926, to consider the petitioner’s claim that the Court of Appeals had misconceived the meaning of the Baren-blatt decision. For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the Court of Appeals was correct, and that its judgment must be affirmed. I…