MALOY ET UX.

v.

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN. OF WEST PALM BEACH

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. MacHibroda, 338 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …s for pardon or parole.” Hibdon v. United States, 204 F. 2d 834, 839, 37 A.L.R.2d 1130 (C.A.6, 1953). See also Audett v. United States, 265 F. 2d 837, 848 (C.A.9, 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 815, 80 S.Ct. 54, 4 L.Ed.2d 62 (1959), rehearing denied, 361 U.S. 926, 80 S.Ct. 290, 4 L.Ed.2d 241 (1960); United States v. Leather, 271 F. 2d 80 (C.A.7, 1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 831, 80 S.Ct. 1602, 4 L.Ed.2d 1525 (1960). Procedurally, as we have noted, these motions were filed under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules…
• Bayless v. United States, 347 F.2d 354 (9th Cir. 1965)
  …have previously announced the rule that multiplicity of sentences may impair a prisoner’s opportunities for pardon or parole. Audett v. United States, 265 F. 2d 837, 848, cert. denied 361 U.S. 815, 80 S.Ct. 54, 4 L.Ed. 2d 62 (1959), rehearing denied 361 U.S. 926, 80 S.Ct. 290, 4 L.Ed.2d 241 (1960). But such an issue is not before us. To prevent its becoming an issue before us in futuro, we make the following orders: (1) The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal is denied. (2) The motion of appellant t…
• Arley C. Browning v. Hand, 284 F.2d 346 (10th Cir. 1960)
  …, the constitutionality of the habitual criminal statute was attacked, but apparently the petitioner did not assert denial of due process because of insufficient notice of the hearing. Browning v. Hand, 184 Kan. 365, 336 P. 2d 409, certiorari denied 361 U.S. 926, 80 S.Ct. 295, 4 L.Ed.2d 240. One convicted of a felony in Kansas is entitled to notice of the hearing held to determine whether he is subject to the provisions of the habitual criminal statute,2 and due process requires notice.3 This is, however, a…