SHAW
v.
NEW JERSEY; HORTON V. BLALOCK; AND RILEY V. NEW JERSEY

U.S. | 1959-11-09
Nos. 134; No. 328; No. 348
361 U.S. 879 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • McMILLAN v. State of N.J., 408 F.2d 1375 (3d Cir. 1969)
    …e fundamental principles of law which control the case,” see State v. Butler, 27 N.J. 560, 595, 143 A. 2d 530, 550 (1958). See, also, State v. Riley, 28 N.J. 188, 145 A. 2d 601 (1958), cert. den. 359 U.S. 313, 79 S.Ct. 891, 3 L.Ed.2d 832, cert. den. 361 U.S. 879, 80 S.Ct. 166, 4 L.Ed.2d 117 (1959). Petitioner further asserts that the failure of his trial counsel to procure, by request or exception, such a charge was ineffective representation amounting to a denial of due process and equal protection. It ap…
  • Horton v. Joseph R. Blalock, M.D., 282 F.2d 782 (4th Cir. 1960)
    …onfined in the Southwestern State Hospital. Horton then sought to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of the United States. His motion was treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari and was denied. Horton v. Blalock, 361 U.S. 879. 80 S.Ct. 165, 4 L.Ed.2d 117. On November 28, 1959, Horton filed a new petition in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia again alleging that he was then sane and seeking his discharge. This petition .was denied on th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw