SOSTRE

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Lannom v. United States, 381 F.2d 858 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …11 L.Ed.2d 115 (1963), and Miller v. United States, 273 F. 2d 279 (5th Cir. 1960), cert, denied, 362 U:S. 928, 80 S. Ct. 756, 4 L.Ed.2d 747 (1960). Neither is in point. Compare United States v. Taylor, 266 F. 2d 310 (7th Cir. 1959), cert, denied, 361 U.S. 853, 80 S.Ct. 96, 4 L.Ed.2d 92 (1959), wherein Government agents, informers, did not transport the contraband until it had already been imported into the United States.…
• Carroll Robinson v. United States, 327 F.2d 618 (8th Cir. 1964)
  …e here. A contention that marihuana can be grown in the United States has been held insufficient to destroy the presumption. United States v. Gibson, supra, p. 82 of 310 F. 2d; United States v. Taylor, 266 F. 2d 310, 312 (7 Cir. 1959), cert. denied 361 U.S. 853, 80 S.Ct. 96, 4 L.Ed.2d 92; Costello v. United States, supra, pp. 263-264 of 324 F. 2d. So also has a defendant’s personal testimony that he did not know that the prohibited substance was imported. United States v. Norton, 310 F. 2d 718 (2 Cir. 1962…
• United States v. Davis, 281 F.2d 93 (7th Cir. 1960)
  …ment. United States v. Detente, 7 Cir., 1952, 199 F. 2d 286, 288; U. S. v. Guido, 7 Cir., 1958, 251 F. 2d 1, 5, certiorari denied 356 U.S. 950, 78 S.Ct. 915, 2 L.Ed.2d 843; United States v. Taylor, 7 Cir., 1959, 266 F. 2d 310, 312, certiorari denied 361 U.S. 853, 80 S.Ct. 96, 4 L.Ed.2d 92. The jury would be justified in concluding that Mrs. Saunders dealt with Mrs. Toomer solely as a representative and accommodation agent of defendant, [*100] and that there was an established pattern of dealing with defend…