LIEBMANN BREWERIES, INC.,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Milligan v. State, 194 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
  …es, D.C.Tenn.1963, 223 F.Supp. 605; Mitchell v. United States, C.A.1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 97, 254 F. 2d 954, Cert. Denied (1962), 371 U.S. 838, 83 S.Ct. 64, 9 L.Ed.2d 73; United States v. Peabody, D.C.Wash.1958, 173 F.Supp. 413, Cert. Denied (1959), 361 U.S. 841, 80 S.Ct. 91, 4 L.Ed.2d 79; and Dennis v. United States, C.A.S.C.1949, 177 F. 2d 195. Appellant’s brief raises only one issue in' this appeal — the neglect of appellant’s original attorney to file a notice of appeal. There are no allegations of any…
• Peabody v. United States, 394 F.2d 175 (9th Cir. 1968)
  …4 F. 2d 954 at page 955.” On appeal to this court, the order of the district court was affirmed. Peabody v. United States (unreported), No. 16359, February 12, 1959. The Supreme Court denied certiorari on October 12, 1959. Peabody v. United States, 361 U.S. 841, 80 S.Ct. 91, 4 L.Ed.2d 79. On April 12, 1966, appellant filed in the district court a second motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming fraud and deceit by his trial counsel in failing to file a notice of appeal within the prescrib…
• DeLaCRUZ v. The Atchison, 405 F.2d 459 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …is likely that they would have been more forcefully brought to the engineer’s attention. Plaintiff, quite properly, does not assert the “last clear chance” doctrine. Atlantic Coast Line RR. Co. v. Anderson, 5 Cir., 1959, 267 F. 2d 329, cert. denied 361 U.S. 841, 80 S.Ct. 83, 4 L.Ed. 2d 79. . Nor, of course, could plaintiff revive rights lost by failure to make timely objection, Ford v. United Gas Corp., 5 Cir., 1958, 254 F. 2d 817, cert. denied 358 U.S. 824, 79 S.Ct. 40, 3 L.Ed.2d 64, by the device of mov…