NATIONAL CAN CORP.
v.
STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

U.S. | 1960-02-23
No. 564
361 U.S. 534 Supreme Court of the United States (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Bufalino, 285 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1960)
    …here questions were answered, if the answers were “evasive” or “incredible.” People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey, 1959, 6 N.Y.2d 390, 189 N.Y.S.2d 898, 900, 160 N.E. 2d 647, appeal dismissed for want of a “properly presented” federal question, 1960, 361 U.S. 534, 80 S.Ct. 585, 4 L.Ed.2d 537; cf. People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskey, 1960, 8 N.Y.2d 959, 204 N.Y.S.2d 188, 168 N.E. 2d 853. This footnote does not purport to be a complete summary of the proceedings in other tribunals involving the Apalachin meet…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw