BATES ET AL.

v.

CITY OF LITTLE ROCK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 (U.S. 1960)
  …nistration of criminal justice, more particularly a defendant’s standing to challenge the legality of a search in the circumstances of this case, as well as the legality of the particular search should standing be established, we granted certiorari. 359 U. S. 988. Both statutory provisions under which petitioner was prosecuted permit conviction upon proof of the defendant’s possession of narcotics, and in the case of 26 U. S. C. § 4704 (a) of the absence of the appropriate stamps. Possession was the basis…
• Bates v. City OF Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (U.S. 1960)
  …embership lists under the circumstances was “not an unconstitutional invasion of the freedoms guaranteed . . .” but “a mere incident to a permissible legal result.”8 Because of the significant constitutional question involved, we granted certiorari. 359 U. S. 988. Like freedom of speech and a free press, the right of peaceable assembly was considered by the Framers of our Constitution to lie at the foundation of a government [*523] based upon the consent of an informed citizenry — a government dedicated to…
• United States v. Price, 361 U.S. 304 (U.S. 1960)
  …not .effective because a 90-day letter had not been issued, and that § 272 (a) therefore barred the action. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 263 F. 2d 382, and in view of contrary decisions in the First and Sixth Circuits,2 we granted cer- • tiorari. 359 U. S. 988. For reasons hereafter stated we think the court below was in error. We start with the language of § 272 '(d). By its terms, . the right of waiver is to be available “at any time,” and is applicable to “the restrictions” contained in § 272 (a). Thos…