GLENN R. GILBERT, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, W. H. CLARK FRUIT COMPANY AND FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENTS
GLENN R. GILBERT, PETITIONER,
FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, W. H. CLARK FRUIT COMPANY AND FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENTS
184 So. 2d 644
Florida Supreme Court (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have- for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 2, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorneys’ fees also is denied.
THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vogel v. City OF Coral Gables, 298 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1974)…er. It is so ordered. ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., concurs in judgment only. . Gen. Accid. Group v. Lieber, 146 So. 2d 896 (Fla.1962); McKinney v. Deel Motors, Inc., 6 F.C.R. 27 (1965), cert. den. 184 So. 2d 644 (Fla.1966). . Tropicana Products, Inc. v. Parrish, 293 So. 2d 683 (Fla.1974); Smith v. Kikilis Florist, 290 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1974); Maysles v. May, 251 So. 2d 251 (Fla.1971).…