CARRIGAN

v.

SUNLAND-TUJUNGA TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vincent, 375 F.2d 129 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …351 U.S. 946, 76 S.Ct. 845, 100 L.Ed. 1471 (1956); White v. Gates, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 346, 253 F. 2d 868, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 973, 78 S.Ct. 1136, 2 L.Ed.2d 1147 (1958); Carrigan v. Sunland-Tujunga Telephone Co., 263 F. 2d 568 (9 Cir.) cert. denied, 359 U.S. 975, 79 S.Ct. 893, 3 L.Ed.2d 841 (1959); Bell v. Waterfront Comm., 279 F. 2d 853, 857-858 (2 Cir. 1960); Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, 327 [*131] F. 2d 131, 138 (2 Cir. 1964)1 This is not merely a power confided to the single district judge bu…
• Bell v. Waterfront Comm'n OF NEW York Harbor, 279 F.2d 853 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …substantial constitutional question has been sustained, as to state action challenged under § 2281, in Jacobs v. Tawes, 4 Cir., 1957, 250 F. 2d 611 and Carrigan v. Sunland-Tujunga [*858] Telephone Co., 9 Cir., 263 F. 2d 568, certiorari denied 1959, 359 U.S. 975, 79 S.Ct. 893, 3 L.Ed.2d 841, and, as to Federal legislation challenged under § 2282, in Wicks v. Southern Pacific Co., 9 Cir., 231 F. 2d 130, certiorari denied, 1956, 351 U.S. 946, 76 S.Ct. 845, 100 L.Ed. 1471, White v. Gates, 1958, 102 U.S.App.D.C…
• Mandel v. Hutchinson, 494 F.2d 364 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …a three-judge court to do so. The three-judge court under these circumstances would have no greater jurisdiction than that of the single district judge. See Carrigan v. Sunland-Tujunga Telephone Co., 263 F. 2d 568, 572-573 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 359 U.S. 975, 79 S.Ct. 893, 3 L.Ed.2d 841 (1959). The trial court found that the appellant had three alternative remedies under California law that were “plain, speedy and efficient.” First, the tax may be paid under protest, a suit may be commenced to recover…