VAN BOGART

v.

ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By

• Simmons v. State, 248 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)
  …make her signature before the jury for the purpose of comparing same with the signature on the alleged forged instrument.” See King v. State, 1913, 8 Ala.App. 239, 62 So. 374; People v. Sauer, 1958, 163 Cal.App.2d 740, 329 P. 2d 962, cert, denied, 359 U.S. 973, 79 S.Ct. 888, 3 L.Ed.2d 839 (1959); People v. Briggs, 1931, 117 Cal.App. 708, 4 P. 2d 593; McGlasson v. State, 1897, 37 Tex.Cr.R. 620, 40 S.W. 503. Therefore, we conclude that such evidence was inadmissible, constituting prejudicial error and the…
• Bray v. United States, 306 F.2d 743 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
  …36 F. 2d 684 (1956); Cash v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 265, 261 F. 2d 731 (1958), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 357 U.S. 219, 78 S.Ct. 1365, 2 L.Ed.2d 1361 (1958), affirmed on remand, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 154, 265 F. 2d 346, cert. denied, 359 U.S. 973, 79 S.Ct. 892, 3 L.Ed.2d 841 (1959). . Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. at 93, 75 S.Ct. at 164, 99 L.Ed. 101. . See McAbee v. United States, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 74, 294 F. 2d 703 (1961). . 48 Stat. 794 (1934). . 326 U.S. at 611, 66 S.Ct. at 404. .…
• Bandy v. United States, 278 F.2d 214 (8th Cir. 1960)
  …to appeal from his conviction in forma pauperis; 357 U.S. 219, 78 S.Ct. 1365, 2 L.Ed.2d 1361, vacating judgment of Court of Appeals, without opinion; and 105 U.S.App.D.C. 154, 265 F. 2d 346, conviction of Cash affirmed per curiam; certiorari denied 359 U.S. 973, 79 S.Ct. 892, 3 L.Ed.2d 841. Since it is our considered opinion that the appeal of Bandy, if taken by a non-indigent defendant would be subject to dismissal under Rule 39(a), Fed.Rules Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C., and is frivolous under the test establi…