STEFANICH

v.

CIRCUIT COURT OF RANDOLPH COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1968)
  …be valid for its limited purpose even though not supported by a sworn affidavit stating probable cause; but the Court ordered reargument on the question whether the warrant had been validly issued in petitioner’s case. 362 U. S., at 219, n., par. 1; 359 U. S. 940. In Lustig v. United States, 338 U. S. 74, the petitioner argued that an exclusionary rule should apply to the fruit of an unreasonable search by state officials solely because they acted in concert with federal officers (see Weeks v. United States,…
• Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217 (U.S. 1960)
  …ation Service warrant and, together with other articles obtained from such leads, are introduced as evidence in a prosecution for espionage?” Argument was first heard at October Term, 1958. The case having been set down for reargument at this Term, 359 U. S. 940, counsel were asked to discuss a series of additional questions, set out in the margin.* We have considered the case on the assumption that the conviction must be reversed should we find challenged items of evidence to have been seized in violation…