BIZZELL

v.

BIZZELL

Citator

Cited By

• Bray v. United States, 306 F.2d 743 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
  …in our opinion of May 24, 1962. So ordered. . The record does not show when that interrogation began or whether it was continuous. See note 15 infra. . See, e. g., Inman v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 150, 243 F. 2d 256 (1957), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 888, 79 S.Ct. 132, 3 L.Ed.2d 116 (1958); Fountain v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 389, 236 F. 2d 684 (1956); Cash v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 265, 261 F. 2d 731 (1958), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 357 U.S. 219, 78 S.Ct. 1365, 2 L.Ed.…
• Clinton St. Greater Bethlehem Church v. City OF Detroit, 484 F.2d 185 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …lement is not well taken. Although the District Court and the Master referred to this agreement as an “accord and satisfaction,” it is more precisely a compromise and settlement, Bizzell v. Bizzell, 247 N.C. 590, 101 S.E. 2d 668, 676, cert, denied, 358 U. S. 888, 79 S.Ct. 129, 3 L.Ed. 115 (1958), a method of resolving disputes which the law favors over litigation. Williams v. First National Bank, 216 U. S. 582, 595, 30 S.Ct. 441, 54 L.Ed. 625 (1910); Miller v. McGinnis. 285 Mich. 28, 280 N.W. 96, 100 (1938…
• Robertson v. United States, 364 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …ossession of stolen goods, there is none which requires that explanation to be “very satisfactory.” 2 I respectfully dissent. . 22 D.C.Code § 2901 (1961). . Compare Inman v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 150, 243 F. 2d 256 (1957), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 888, 79 S.Ct. 132, 3 L.Ed.2d 116 (1958).…