TERRITO ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1959-01-12
No. 454
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
358 U.S. 279 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the notice thereof was not filed within the time provided by law.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733 (U.S. 1974)
    …s contentions that the asserted defects in appellants’ filing of their [*743] notice of appeal should be treated as a failure to file a timely notice of appeal, and that the appeal must accordingly be dismissed. See, e. g., Territo v. United States, 358 U. S. 279 (1959); Department of Banking v. Pink, 317 U. S. 264, 268 (1942). He also urges that the question whether an appeal may be taken to this Court from the Court of Appeals under 28 U. S. C. § 1252 presents a question of first impression. We hold that…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw