ACCARDO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Bowles v. United States, 439 F.2d 536 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …decided to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege. We have considered other contentions presented by appellant’s counsel.7 We find no reason for reversal. Affirmed. . Accardo v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 4, 249 F. 2d 519 (1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 943, 78 S.Ct. 787, 2 L.Ed.2d 817 (1958); Bullock v. United States, (No. 22,480, March 17, 1970). . Even so this evidence of the appearance of the scene is not as probative on the issue of intent as the earmarks of a plan to rob, manifesting themselves…
• Harrison v. United States, 387 F.2d 203 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …341, 60 S.Ct. 266, 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939). . See supra, note 1; Harrison v. United States, supra note 5, 123 U.S.App.D.C. at 236 n. 17, 359 F. 2d at 220 n. 17. . Compare Accardo v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 4, 249 F. 2d 519 (1957), cert. denied 356 U.S. 943, 78 S.Ct. 787, 2 L.Ed.2d 817 (1958). . A Government witness residing across the street from Brown’s house saw a male come out of Brown’s doorway immediately after the shot “and put something under his coat, a gun, and ran down the street * * * . S…
• Williams v. United States, 317 F.2d 569 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  …that her wallet was missing from her pocketbook. [*572] Money was found on petitioner’s person. This evidence plainly supports the jury’s verdict of guilty of robbery. Accardo v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 4, 249 F. 2d 519 (1957), cert. denied 356 U.S. 943 [78 S.Ct. 787, 2 L.Ed.2d 817] (1958); Wigfall v. United States, 97 U.S. App.D.C. 252, 230 F. 2d 220 (1956). With regard to petitioner’s other contention, that the trial judge’s admonition constituted plain error, (see Memo, p. 6), we submit that on…