GUERLAIN, INC.,
v.
UNITED STATES
GUERLAIN, INC.,
UNITED STATES
355 U.S. 937
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Gruen, 586 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…7) (struck down ordinance, which required convicted felons who remained in Los Angeles for more than five days to register with police, since ordinance punished a failure to act without requiring a showing of knowledge of duty to act), reh'g denied, 355 U.S. 937, 78 S.Ct. 410, 2 L.Ed.2d 419 (1958); Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. Minnesota, 218 U.S. 57, 30 S.Ct. 663, 54 L.Ed. 930 (1910) (held statute did not deny due process of law, but may be justified as a valid exercise of police power). The statute in the ins…
-
Tampa Elec. Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., 276 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1960)…rly seen in the Court’s opinion in the du Pont cellophane case. An excellent analysis of the proper application of the “line of commerce” test is found in United States v. Guerlain, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1957, 155 F.Supp. 77, 85, probable jurs. noted 355 U.S. 937, 951, 78 S.Ct. 429, 544, 2 L.Ed.2d 420, 527, judgments vacated for consideration of United States’ motion to dismiss 1958, Parfume Corday, Inc., v. United States, 358 U.S. 915, 79 S.Ct. 286, 3 L.Ed.2d 236. In that action it was alleged that certain…
-
United States v. Juzwiak, 258 F.2d 844 (2d Cir. 1958)…the evidence discloses that the defendant did not have actual knowledge of the statutory requirement to register, and therefore, under the rule of Lambert v. People of State of California, 355 U.S. 225, 78 S.Ct. 240, 2 L.Ed.2d 228, rehearing denied 355 U.S. 937, 78 S.Ct. 410, 2 L.Ed.2d 419, the conviction cannot stand. The facts are not in dispute. It is admitted that the defendant had been convicted of the violation of the narcotics law above mentioned, and that he left the United States without register…