METROPOLITAN BAG & PAPER DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Leach v. United States, 334 F.2d 945 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
  …ial judge’s refusal to hold .a probation hearing, and, on the second .appeal, after a hearing had been accorded and probation denied, set aside the .sentence as too severe. See also United States v. Frank, 245 F. 2d 284, 288 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 819, 78 S.Ct. 25, 2 L.Ed.2d 35 (1957); United States v. Cosentino, 191 F. 2d 574, 575 (7th Cir. 1951). The sentence will be set aside and the •case remanded with directions to grant the defendant’s request for a mental ex- . animation before re-sentenc…
• DEW v. Najeeb E. Halaby, 317 F.2d 582 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  …fficiency of the service within the meaning of Section 14 of the Veterans Preference Act. * * * ” No further statement of the reasons for the discharge was required. See Green v. Baughman, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 187, 189, 243 F. 2d 610, 612, cert. denied, 355 U.S. 819, 78 S.Ct. 25, 2 L.Ed. 2d 35 (1957), where we said: “The second point is that the decision in the letter of notification stated no reasons, simply saying ‘that the charges are sustained’. The statute provides that no preference eligible shall be dis…
• Hamman v. United States, 340 F.2d 145 (9th Cir. 1965)
  …t laid showing that appellants willfully evaded taxes for such years. Understatement of income tax in prior years, without further evidence of willfulness, is admissible to show intent. See United States v. Frank, 245 F. 2d 284 (3rd Cir. 1957), C.D. 355 U.S. 819, 78 S.Ct. 25, [*150] 2 L.Ed.2d 35 (1957); Holland v. United States, supra. This Circuit has held such evidence admissible in a tax evasion case to establish fraudulent intent as to the offense charged. Mitchell v. United States, 213 F. 2d 951 (9th C…