AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION ET AL.
v.
POWER AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION ET AL.
POWER AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
355 U.S. 64
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
[*65] Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the petition upon the ground that the cause is moot.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bond v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2077 (U.S. 2014)…542-543 (C.A.D.C.1957) (Bazelon, J.) ("No court has ever said ... that the treaty power can be exercised without limit to affect matters which are of purely domestic concern and do not pertain to our relations with other nations"), vacated as moot, 355 U.S. 64, 78 S.Ct. 141, 2 L.Ed.2d 107 (1957) ( per curiam ). A common refrain in these cases is that the Treaty Power "extends to all proper subjects of negotiation with foreign governments." In re Ross, 140 U.S. 453, 463, 11 S.Ct. 897, 35 L.Ed. 581 (1891)…
-
Holmes v. Laird, 459 F.2d 1211 (D.C. Cir. 1972)…. 59; New York Indians v. United States, 170 U.S. 1, 22-23, 18 S.Ct. 531, 42 L.Ed. 927 (1898). Cf. Power Authority of New York v. FPC, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 132, 247 F. 2d 538, vacated as moot sub nom. American Power Ass’n v. Power Authority of New York, 355 U.S. 64, 78 S.Ct. 141, 2 L.Ed. 2d 107 (1957). . The views stated by proponents of ratification parallel those advanced in the Report of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Exec.Rept. No. 1, 83d Cong. 1st Sess. (1953). . See note 98, infra. . The r…