GUTIERREZ
v.
ARIZONA

U.S. | 1957-10-14
No. 25
355 U.S. 17 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Warner, 428 F.2d 730 (8th Cir. 1970)
    …ndigent accused desires the government to furnish him a lawyer. If the accused answers “no,” that will suffice. I cannot believe this kind of cursory examination fulfills a trial judge’s obligation under the Constitution. See McGee v. United States, 355 U.S. 17, 78 S.Ct. 64, 2 L.Ed.2d 23 (1957).1 Even an educated and intelligent individual, unless he is trained in the law, has little understanding as to what a trial involves: the testing of an indictment, the skill in selecting a fair jury, the rules of p…
  • Gibson v. Dell, 443 F.2d 75 (9th Cir. 1971)
    …d guilty did not state a crime. His assertion of equal protection denial because a judge or jury can fix a crime as a felony or a misdemeanor depending on the sentence is without merit. See In Re Gutierrez, 82 Ariz. 21, 307 P. 2d 914, cert. denied 355 U.S. 17, 78 S.Ct. 79, 2 L.Ed.2d 23. Olsen v. Delmore, 1956, 48 Wash.2d 545, 295 P. 2d 324, and State v. Pirkey, 1955, 203 Or. 697, 281 P. 2d 698, cited by appellant are distinguishable for the reasons ably stated by the district judge in his order denying…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw