WILLIAMS
v.
SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY; EX PARTE JONES; WILLIAMS V. RAGEN, WARDEN; EX PARTE JACKSON; EX PARTE EMANUEL; HANNON V. WARDEN, MISSOURI STATE PENITENTIARY; CHAPMAN V. ALVIS, WARDEN; LEWIS V. LOONEY, WARDEN; FRANKLIN V. INDIANA; PALMER V. LOONEY, WARDEN; MCCALL V. NORTH CAROLINA; HARRELL V. HAGERMAN, WARDEN; CAMERON V. GLADDEN, WARDEN; AND TURMEL V. ROBBINS, WARDEN, ET AL.

U.S. | 1957-02-25
Nos. 373; No. 403; No. 404; No. 414; No. 423; No. 431; No. 436; No. 438; No. 452; No. 453; No. 456; No. 501; No. 521; No. 524
352 U.S. 999 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Elec. Coop., Inc., 356 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1958)
    …amages for injuries allegedly caused by the respondent’s negligence. He had judgment on a jury verdict. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed and directed the entry of judgment for the respondent. 238 F. 2d 346. We granted certiorari, 352 U. S. 999, and subsequently ordered reargument, 355 U. S. 950. The respondent is in the business of selling electric power to subscribers in rural sections of South Carolina. The petitioner was employed as a lineman in the construction crew of a construction…
  • Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dist. 50, 355 U.S. 453 (U.S. 1958)
    …ployees at a time at least 60 days later than the date of this notice.” 99 U. S. App. D. C., at 109, 237 F. 2d, at 590. [*458] Because important questions of the administration of the Act were raised, we granted certiorari on the Board’s petition. 352 U. S. 999. The Board’s order was fashioned under § 10 (c), 29 U. S. C. § 160 (c), which vests remedial power in the Board to redress unfair labor practices by “an order requiring such person [committing the unfair labor practice] to cease and desist from su…
  • Blue Ridge Rural Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Byrd, 264 F.2d 689 (4th Cir. 1958)
    …r., 238 F. 2d 346. Our decision was based on the holding that Blue Ridge had complied with the Workmen’s Compensation statute of South Carolina and that Byrd’s remedy was confined to compensation under that act. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, 352 U.S. 999, 77 S.Ct. 557, 1 L.Ed.2d 544, and after reargument, 355 U.S. 950, 78 S.Ct. 530, 2 L.Ed.2d 527, reversed our decision, 356 U.S. 525, 78 S.Ct. 893, 2 L.Ed.2d 953, on the ground that the facts had not been sufficiently developed in the District Court a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw