LEONARD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Pattno v. United States, 311 F.2d 604 (10th Cir. 1962)
  …53 Wyo. 467, 84 P. 2d 736, 120 A.L.R. 1020, and Stockwell v. Morris, 46 Wyo. 1, 22 P. 2d 189. The Tenth Circuit followed the rule stated by Blessing v. Pittman in Leonard v. United States, 10 Cir., 235 F. 2d 330, certiorari granted and case remanded 352 U.S. 996, 77 S.Ct. 555, 1 L.Ed.2d 540. . See United States ex rel. Gillett v. Dern, 64 App.D.C. 81, 74 F. 2d 485, 487. . 2 U.S.Cong. & Adm.News ’60, p. 3492. . 32 U.S.C. § 715.…
• United States v. Hainline, 315 F.2d 153 (10th Cir. 1963)
  …nt” means “acting in line of duty.” 28 U.S. C. § 2671; Hinson v. United States, 5 Cir., 257 F. 2d 178; Leonard v. United States, D.Wyo., 131 F.Supp. 694, aff’d 9 Cir., 235 F. 2d 330, cert. granted and remanded to trial court on motion of the parties 352 U.S. 996, 77 S.Ct. 555, 1 L.Ed.2d 540. In actions brought under the Act, the scope of employment is determined by the state law. Williams v. United States, 350 U.S. 857, 76 S.Ct. 100, 100 L.Ed. 761; Pattno v. United States, 10 Cir., 311 F. 2d 604. Under Kan…
• United States v. Farmer, 400 F.2d 107 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …apin v. United States, 258 F. 2d 495 (9th cir. 1958), cert, denied, 359 u.S. 924, 79 S.Ct. 607, 3 L.Ed.2d 627 (1959) (California law); Leonard v. United States, 235 F. 2d 330 (10th Cir. 1956) (Wyoming law), remanded to district court for settlement, 352 U.S. 996, 77 S.Ct. 555, 1 L.Ed.2d 540 (1957); Kimball v. United States, 262 F.Supp. 509 (D.N.J.1967) (New Jersey law); Bissell v. McElligott, supra (Missouri law); Cobb v. United States, 247 F. Supp. 505 (N.D.Ill.1965), aff’d, Cobb v. Kumm, 367 F. 2d 132 (7t…