NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• N. Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1958)
  …l routing” clauses or from entering into any future agreements containing them. The defendant took a direct appeal to this Court under § 2 of the Expediting Act of 1903, 32 Stat. 823, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 29, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 352 U. S. 980. The Sherman Act was designed to be a comprehensive charter of economic liberty aimed at preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade. It rests on the premise that the unrestrained interaction of competitive forces will yield the…
• Wiener v. United States, 357 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1958)
  …ner [*351] from December 10, 1953, the day of his removal by the President, to June 30, 1954, the last day of the Commission’s existence. A divided Court of Claims dismissed the petition, 135 Ct. Cl. 827, 142 F. Supp. 910. We brought the case here, 352 U. S. 980, because it presents a variant of the constitutional issue decided in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U. S. 602.* Controversy pertaining to the scope and limits of the President’s power of removal fills a thick chapter of our political an…
• United States v. Korpan, 354 U.S. 271 (U.S. 1957)
  …olding that respondent’s machines did not come within the definition laid down by §4462 (a) (2). 237 F. 2d 676. On the Government’s petition we granted certiorari because the case raised important questions in the administration of the revenue laws. 352 U. S. 980. The issue before us is whether the machines maintained by petitioner were included within the definition given by § 4462 (a) (2).2 For the reasons stated hereafter we believe that they were within that definition and that the judgment of the Court…