ALLOCCO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Bruce v. Travelers Ins. Co., 266 F.2d 781 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …al Drilling Co., 5 Cir., 1057, 245 F. 2d 717; Fontenot v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., D.C.La., 344 F.Supp. 818, affirmed 5 Cir., 243 F. 2d 574. . See Senko v. La Crosse Dredging Corp., 1957, 352 U.S. 370, 77 S.Ct. 415, 1 L.Ed. 2d 404, rehearing denied 352 U.S. 931, 77 S.Ct. 716, 1 L.Ed.2d 724; Grimes v. Raymond Concrete Pile Co., 1958, 356 U.S. 252, 78 S.Ct. 687, 2 L.Ed.2d 737, and the four eases cited in the Gianfala per curiam: South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. Bassett, 1940, 309 U.S. 251, 60 S.Ct. 544, 84 L…
• United States v. Allocco, 305 F.2d 704 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …el of this Court found that the evidence of Allocco’s guilt was “overwhelming” and that the jury’s verdict was “thoroughly justified.” Hence, the conviction was affirmed. U.S. v. Allocco, 234 F. 2d 955, 956 (2d Cir. 1956) (per curiam), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 931, 77 S.Ct. 231, 1 L.Ed.2d 165 (1957). Allocco began to serve his sentence, but he continued to challenge his conviction. A description of his efforts is set forth in the opinion of the court below in the instant proceedings, but the earlier applicat…
• United States v. Trumblay, 256 F.2d 615 (7th Cir. 1958)
  …by two court appointed counsel, who had not participated in his trial and first appeal. This order was appealed to this court and affirmed in an opinion by Chief Judge Duffy. United States v. Trumblay, 7 Cir., 1956, 234 F. 2d 273, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 931, 77 S.Ct. 233, 1 L.Ed.2d 166. Trumblay filed this, his second petition to vacate sentence, which is now being served in Alcatraz, California, almost four and one-half years after his conviction, and now comes before this court on his third appeal.…