MCCALL

v.

NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• Houser v. United States, 508 F.2d 509 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …ox v. United States, 351 F. 2d 280 (8th Cir. 1965). . Williams v. United States, 344 F. 2d 264, 265 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 857, 86 S.Ct. 112, 15 L.Ed.2d 95 (1965); Lewis v. United States, 16 Alaska 341, 235 F. 2d 580, 581, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 897, 77 S.Ct. 136, 1 L.Ed.2d 89 (1956). . Runge v. United States, 427 F. 2d 122 (10th Cir. 1970); see Ragavage v. United States, 272 F. 2d 196, 197 (5th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 806, 80 S.Ct. 1241, 4 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1960). . Adkins v. United S…
• United States v. Jones, 527 F.2d 817 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …hich has been called upon to interpret the meaning of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act’s double prosecution bar in the context of a single trial under both federal and local drug laws. See Lewis v. United States, 235 F. 2d 580 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 897, 77 S.Ct. 136, 1 L.Ed.2d 89 (1956). In Lewis both the court and the Govern [*834] ment itself considered untenable the interpretation adopted by the majority here: The Alaska statute prohibits prosecution thereunder if the accused has been “acquitt…

  ← 1 / 2 →