BAUMANN ET AL.
v.
SMRHA, CHIEF ENGINEER, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES, KANSAS STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL.
BAUMANN ET AL.
SMRHA, CHIEF ENGINEER, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES, KANSAS STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL.
352 U.S. 863
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
[*863] Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eli Sutker v. Ill. State Dental Soc'y, 808 F.2d 632 (7th Cir. 1986)…st to those parts of the process where his participation is essential. As Justice Schaefer wrote for the Supreme Court of Illinois in People ex rel. Chicago Dental Soc'y v. A.A.A. Dental Laboratories, 8 Ill.2d 330, 134 N.E. 2d 285, appeal dismissed, 352 U.S. 863, 77 S.Ct. 97, 1 L.Ed.2d 73 (want of substantial federal question),5 reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 919, 77 S.Ct. 212, 1 L.Ed.2d 124 (1956), the legislature may: if it sees fit, go further and insure that responsibility to the patient shall not be fragmente…1 / 2