RIVERBANK LABORATORIES
v.
HARDWOOD PRODUCTS CORP.

U.S. | 1956-04-02
No. 66
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
350 U.S. 1003 Supreme Court of the United States (1956) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 100 L. Ed. 2d 866 · 76 S. Ct. 648 · 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1167 · SCDB 1955-064
Cited by 24 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Certiorari, 350 U. S. 817, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Argued January 16, 1956. Decided April 2, 1956.

Per Curiam:

The Court is of the opinion that the District Court correctly found there was proper service upon the defendant in this case. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings.*

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

*

As amended by order entered April 9, 1956, post, p. 1012.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

  • Jaftex Corp. v. Randolph Mills, Inc., 282 F.2d 508 (2d Cir. 1960)
    …lready found an answer by the Supreme Court to this very problem. See K. Shapiro, Inc. v. New York Cent. R. Co., D.C.E.D.Mich., 152 F.Supp. 722, commenting upon the brief decision in Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp., 350 U.S. 1003, 76 S.Ct. 648, 100 L. Ed. 866, reversing 7 Cir., 220 F. 2d 465, to uphold service upon a foreign corporation. But the Court’s opinion is too brief and cryptic to make such a conclusion assured. See Note, Federal and State Precedents on Doing Business: Jurisdictio…
    1 / 2
  • Bistram v. United States, 253 F.2d 610 (8th Cir. 1958)
    …iorari denied, 347 U.S. 962, 74 S.Ct. 711, 98 L.Ed. 1105, rehearing denied, 347 U.S. 1022, 74 S.Ct. 875, 98 L.Ed. 1142; Lipscomb v. United States, 8 Cir., 226 F. 2d 812, certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 971, 76 S.Ct. 445, 100 L.Ed. 843; rehearing denied, 350 U.S. 1003, 76 S.Ct. 550, 100 L.Ed. 866; United States v. Gallagher, supra; Mahaffey v. Hudspeth, supra; Levine v. United States, 8 Cir., 182 F. 2d 556, 558; Bickford v. Looney, 10 Cir., 219 F. 2d 555. Appellant’s final complaint goes to the refusal of the Di…
  • Johnston v. United States, 254 F.2d 239 (8th Cir. 1958)
    …tates, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack. Lipscomb v. United States, 8 Cir., 226 F. 2d 812, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 971, 76 S.Ct. 445, 100 L.Ed. 843, rehearing denied 350 U.S. 1003, 76 S.Ct. 550, 100 L.Ed. 866; Johnson v. United States, 5 Cir., 213 F. 2d 492; Bloombaum v. United States, 4 Cir., 211 F. 2d 944. It is clear from the motion filed by appellant and the files and records of the case that the court was vested with ju…

Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw