HOSS ET AL.

v.

PURINTON

Citator

Cited By

• Transportation-Communication Emps. Union v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 385 U.S. 157 (U.S. 1966)
  …., 349 U. S. 366, 372. In 1959, after some courts had refuséd to enforce the Board’s awards where it had failed to notify the nonpetitioning union, see, e. g., Order of R. R. Telegraphers v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 229 F. 2d 59, cert. denied, 350 U. S. 997, the Railway Labor Executives’ Association, composed of the various railroad unions, changed this policy to the extent that notice would henceforth be given to non-petitioning unions. Yet the Railway Labor Executives’ Association prescribed a form-l…
• Washington Neal v. Sys. Bd. OF Adjustment (Missouri Pac. Railroad), 348 F.2d 722 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …, therefore, being a party to that agreement, is clearly an entity whose [*728] presence is indispensable to the maintenance of the present suit. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. New Orleans T. & M. Ry., 229 F. 2d 59, 67 (8 Cir. 1956), cert. denied 350 U.S. 997, 76 S.Ct. 548, 100 L.Ed. 861; Shields v. Barrow, 17 Howard (58 U.S.) 130, 139, 15 L.Ed. 158 (1855); Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Union Pac. R.R., 231 F.Supp. 33, 36-37 (D.Colo.1964). Yet the Brotherhood is certainly not here as a direct party…
• United States v. Burks, 470 F.2d 432 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …8, 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954); Volianitis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 352 F. 2d 766, 768 (1965); United States v. Ashby, 5 Cir., 245 F. 2d 684, 686 (1957); Hoss v. Purinton, 9 Cir., 229 F. 2d 104, 108-109, 16 Alaska 48, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 997, 76 S.Ct. 547, 100 L.Ed. 861 (1956). . See United States v. Lewis, supra note 6, 140 U.S.App.D.C. at 45 n. 22, 433 F. 2d at 1151 n. 22; Sacks v. Sacks, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 165, 124 F. 2d 527 (1941).…