UNITED STATES
v.
TWIN CITY POWER COMPANY OF GEORGIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1956-01-30
No. 209
Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Minton, and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Burton's dissent in United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U. S., at 229.
350 U.S. 956 Supreme Court of the United States (1956) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Writ Of Certiorari

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Certiorari cases and more on FLexlaw

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U. S. 222.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Minton, and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Burton's dissent in United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U. S., at 229.

Solicitor General Sobelofj for the United States. David W. Robinson for respondents.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Twin City Power Co. OF Ga., 253 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1958)
    …2d 299. The Supreme Court reversed on the ground that the United States did not have to pay the value of the lands for a reservoir site on a navigable river. United States v. Twin City Power Co., 1956, 350 U.S. 222, 76 S.Ct. 259, 100 L.Ed. 240; Id., 350 U.S. 956, 76 S.Ct. 346, 100 L.Ed. 832, rehearing denied 350 U.S. 1009, 76 S.Ct. 648, 100 L.Ed. 871. At the request of counsel for the parties, the commission had made alternative findings of fact, and had determined an agricultural and wild forest valuation…
    1 / 2
  • Walters v. Moore-McCORMACK Lines, Inc., 309 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1962)
    …belligerent and inebriated, struck the plaintiff with a brandy bottle and returned later to finish his work with a large knife. Thompson v. Coastal Oil Co., 119 F.Supp. 838 (D.N.J.1954), rev’d on other grounds, 221 F. 2d 559 (3rd Cir. 1955), aff'd, 350 U.S. 956, 76 S.Ct. 345, 100 L.Ed. 832, rehearing and reversal, 352 U.S. 862, 77 S.Ct. 90, 1 L.Ed.2d 73 (1956), presents the unsavory portrait of an individual characterized by the court as a “homicidal paranoiac” with “truly vicious propensities” attacking a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw