HOUSE
v.
SWOPE, WARDEN

U.S. | 1956-01-16
No. 28
350 U.S. 945 Supreme Court of the United States (1956) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration in light of new information.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Pelegrina v. United States, 601 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1979)
    …6 F.Supp. 948, 952 (D.N.J.1978); 8A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 33.03[2] at 33-16 n.12 (2d ed. 1978). . See United States ex rel. House v. Swope, 219 F. 2d 538, 539 (5th Cir. 1955), vacated and remanded for consideration in light of new information, 350 U.S. 945, 76 S.Ct. 324, 100 L.Ed. 824 (1956); Clark v. United States, 370 F.Supp. 92, 95 (W.D.Penn.), aff'd without published opinion, 506 F. 2d 1050 (3d Cir. 1974) (newly discovered evidence, even in the form of a confession of another, is not a ground for…
  • United States ex rel. Albert R. House v. Swope, 232 F.2d 853 (5th Cir. 1956)
    …prove the facts alleged.6 Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing under Section 2255. Reversed and remanded. . United States ex rel. House v. Swope, 5 Cir., 219 F. 2d 538. . House v. Swope, 350 U.S. 945, 76 S.Ct. 324. . Under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. . See also, Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266, 287, 68 S.Ct. 1049, 92 L.Ed. 1356; United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61, 65, 66, 25 L.Ed. 93. . The Government’s brief says that the Henderson referred t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw