LAWLOR ET AL., TRADING AS INDEPENDENT POSTER EXCHANGE,

v.

NATIONAL SCREEN SERVICE CORPORATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1963)
  …eated by § 349 (a) (10) is wholly at odds with the decisions of the Court which hold that in cases such as this a heavy burden is upon the Government to prove an act of expatriation by clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence. Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U. S. 920; Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U. S. 129. This standard commands that “evidentiary ambiguities are not to be resolved against the citizen.” Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U. S., at 136. Without pausing to consider whether this evidentiary standard is a consti…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Woodby v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 385 U.S. 276 (U.S. 1966)
  …Wigmore, Evidence §§ 2488-2493, 2497-2498 (3d ed. 1940). Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U. S. 118; Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U. S. 665; Nowak v. United States, 356 U. S. 660; Chaunt v. United States, 364 U. S. 350. Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U. S. 920; Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U. S. 129. But see § 349 (c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 75 Stat. 656 (1961), 8 U. S. C. § 1481 (c). This standard, or an even higher one, has traditionally been imposed in cases involving allegations of civil…
• Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1958)
  …f the Court of Appeals. See also Hamamoto v. Acheson, 98 F. Supp. 904. Compare Acheson v. Okimura, 342 U. S. 899; Acheson v. Murata, 342 U. S. 900, and the dissenting opinion in Mandoli v. Acheson, 344 U. S. 133, 139. As we read Gonzales v. London, 350 U. S. 920, cited in the majority opinion, that case related simply to the standard, and not to the burden, of proof in denationalization cases. The Court not only reaches a conclusion inconsistent with the usual rules governing burden of proof, but does so i…

  ← 1 / 4 →