T. A. LOVING & CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• Hardin v. Ky. Utils. Co., 390 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968)
  …11, 1959, 86th Cong., 1st Sess., 110, 115 (testimony of Representative Vinson); id., at 122 (testimony of Representative Boykin). Petitioners’ reliance on Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 96 U. S. App. D. C. 273, 225 F. 2d 924, cert. denied, 350 U. S. 884 (1955), is thus misplaced. The Court in McKay ruled that an explicit statutory provision was necessary to confer standing because of the “long established rule” that an injured competitor cannot sue to enforce statutory requirements not designed to…
• Scanwell Labs., Inc. v. John H. Shaffer (Acting) of The Fed. Aviation Admin., 424 F.2d 859 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …h Cong., 2d Sess. 37-38 (1946) (emphasis added). The view that the Act was reflective of existing law was supported by the opinion of this court in Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 273, 225 F. 2d 924 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 884, 76 S.Ct. 137, 100 L.Ed. 780 (1955), in which Judge Washington stated that the section was declaratory of existing law. The weight of that decision has been greatly reduced, however, by the decision of the Supreme Court in Hardin v. Kentucky Utiliti…
• Pickus v. United States Bd. OF Parole, 507 F.2d 1107 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 51, 269 F. 2d 242; but compare Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1968, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 159, 392 F. 2d 483; Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 1955, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 273, 225 F. 2d 924, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 884, 76 S.Ct. 137, 100 L.Ed. 780. Decisions of other courts of appeals on this question are irreconcilably conflicting.4 The Supreme Court has not clearly and explicitly settled the matter, but we read the Court’s decisions as lending significant suppo…