COVEY

v.

TOWN OF SOMERS

Citator

Cited By

• Schulz v. Pa. R.R. Co., 350 U.S. 523 (U.S. 1956)
  …ed, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” 4 We granted certiorari to consider the failure of the District Court to let this case go to the jury. 350 U. S. 882. While some facts were in dispute there was evidence from which a jury could have found: On Christmas Day 1949, at about 5:15 p. m., the deceased, Schulz, reported for work on his job at Pier H, Jersey City, New Jersey, and was assigned to work on…
• Isadore Blumenfield v. United States, 284 F.2d 46 (8th Cir. 1960)
  …hat the omission of the name of the woman transported [*50] might not protect them subsequently in a plea of former jeopardy, they could have called for a bill of particulars. See Heasley v. United States, 8 Cir., 218 F. 2d 86, 89, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 882, 76 S.Ct. 134, 100 L.Ed. 778; Rosen v. United States, 161 U.S. 29, 34, 40, 16 S.Ct. 434. As we have seen, the court announced that, upon request, it would require the Government to provide defendants with a bill of particulars, this notwithstanding…
• Covey v. Town of Somers, 351 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1956)
  …883, 129 N. Y. S. 2d 537. The Court of Appeals, which, as noted before, certified that a question under the Fourteenth Amendment was raised and necessarily decided, likewise affirmed. 308 N. Y. 798, 125 N. E. 2d 862. We noted probable jurisdiction. 350 U. S. 882. At this stage of the proceedings we are bound, as were the courts below, to assume that the facts are as disclosed by the uncontroverted affidavits filed with appellant’s motion for an order to show cause. From these it appears that Nora Brainard…