ELLIS
v.
DIXON ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF YONKERS; PAPALARDO ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, IN RE RINES, ADMINISTRATOR, SCHWARTZ, ADMINISTRATRIX, V. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.; BEECHER V. LEAVENWORTH STATE BANK ET AL.; BEECHER V. LEAVENWORTH STATE BANK ET AL.; ALKER V. FIDELITY-PHILADELPHIA TRUST CO., TRUSTEE, ET AL.; BEATY V. UNITED STATES; THYS COMPANY ET AL. V. ANGLO-CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK, EXECUTOR; COCO V. FLORIDA; HUPMAN V. UNITED STATES; KOSTAL V. CALIFORNIA; HEIRENS V. ILLINOIS; RODRIGUEZ V. JACKSON, WARDEN; WILSON V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; HILL V. UNITED STATES
ELLIS
DIXON ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF YONKERS; PAPALARDO ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, IN RE RINES, ADMINISTRATOR, SCHWARTZ, ADMINISTRATRIX, V. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.; BEECHER V. LEAVENWORTH STATE BANK ET AL.; BEECHER V. LEAVENWORTH STATE BANK ET AL.; ALKER V. FIDELITY-PHILADELPHIA TRUST CO., TRUSTEE, ET AL.; BEATY V. UNITED STATES; THYS COMPANY ET AL. V. ANGLO-CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK, EXECUTOR; COCO V. FLORIDA; HUPMAN V. UNITED STATES; KOSTAL V. CALIFORNIA; HEIRENS V. ILLINOIS; RODRIGUEZ V. JACKSON, WARDEN; WILSON V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; HILL V. UNITED STATES
350 U.S. 855
Supreme Court of the United States (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp. of Am., 251 F.2d 801 (9th Cir. 1957)…955, 224 F. 2d 331, 334; Thys Co. v. Oeste, D.C. Cal.1953, 111 F.Supp. 665, 674, affirmed Thys Co. v. Angelo California Nat. Bank, 9 Cir., 1955, 219 F. 2d 131, certiorari denied 1955, 349 U.S. 946, 75 S.Ct. 875, 99 L.Ed. 1272, rehearing denied 1955, 350 U.S. 855, 76 S.Ct. 40, 100 L.Ed. 760. . The appellee compounds its error by having “Judge Learned Hand” “adopt”, in the opinion in 194 F. 427, “the law set forth” thirteen years later by him in the Campbell Metal Window Corporation ease, infra, reported in…1 / 2
-
Burgess Melvin Carson v. United States, 411 F.2d 631 (5th Cir. 1969)…the registrant has made out a prima facie case, which he has the burden of doing, of right to the desired classification. United States v. Hill, 221 F. 2d 437 (7 Cir. 1955), cert. denied 349 U.S. 964, 75 S.Ct. 897, 99 L.Ed. 1286 (1955), reh. denied 350 U.S. 855, 76 S.Ct. 41, 100 L.Ed. 760 (1955), cert. denied 351 U.S. 971, 76 S.Ct. 1039, 100 L.Ed. 1489 (1956) and the cases cited therein. The appellant fell short of establishing such a case. Beliefs which are “ * * * essential- ly political, sociological o…
-
Powers v. Citizens Union Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co., 329 F.2d 507 (6th Cir. 1964)…w, is grounds for dismissal of the appeal. Rule 73(a), Rules of Civil Procedure; Beecher v. Smithson, 217 F. 2d 304, 305, C.A. 9th, cert. denied sub nom. Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank, 349 U.S. 945, 75 S.Ct. 873, 99 L.Ed. 1271, rehearing denied, 350 U.S. 855, 76 S.Ct. 39, 100 L.Ed. 760. Appellant is given ten days from the date of the entry of this order to execute the appeal bond required by Rule 73(c), Rules of Civil Procedure. A ruling on appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is passed until afte…