GREENWOOD
v.
UNITED STATES
GREENWOOD
UNITED STATES
350 U.S. 821
Supreme Court of the United States (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Edise M. Thompson v. Thompson, 93 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1957)…App. 2d 819, 286 P. 2d 539, where the California court ordered the obligor to pay less than the amount of support awarded by the decree of a court of another state; and Whittlesey v. Bellah, 1955, 130 Cal.App.2d 182, 278 P. 2d 511, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 821, 76 S.Ct. 47, 100 L.Ed. 734, where it was held that the California court had jurisdiction to entertain a petition under the Act seeking a greater amount of support than that awarded in a divorce decree entered in another state. The question of whet…
-
Greenwood v. United States, 350 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1956)…cause of conflicting views in the Courts of Appeals, compare Higgins v. United States, 205 F. 2d 650, and Wells v. Attorney General, 201 F. 2d 556, with the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in this case, we granted certiorari. 350 U. S. 821. A detailed history of the legislation is set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. 219 F. 2d, at 380-384. It is sufficient to note here that the bill was proposed by the Judicial Conference of the United States after long study by a conspi…
-
Logsdon v. United States, 253 F.2d 12 (6th Cir. 1958)…o: Boehm v. United States, 8 Cir., 123 F. 2d 791, 812, certiorari denied 315 U.S. 800, 62 S.Ct. 626, 86 L.Ed. 1200, rehearing denied 315 U.S. 828, 62 S.Ct. 794, 86 L.Ed. 1223; Orton v. United States, 4 Cir., 221 F. 2d 632, 634-635, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 821, 76 S.Ct. 47, 100 L.Ed. 734. We have- considered other contentions of the appellant, but find no prejudicial error with respect thereto. The judgment is affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence