HOLOPHANE CO., INC.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1955-10-10
No. 132
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this question.
350 U.S. 814 Supreme Court of the United States (1955) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Doud v. Hodge, 350 U.S. 485 (U.S. 1956)
    …authoritative determination by the Supreme Court of Illinois as to whether the exemption of the American Express Company from the terms of the Act is unconstitutional as applied to these appellants. 127 F. Supp. 853. We noted probable jurisdiction. 350 U. S. 814. It is clear that the District Court had jurisdiction to entertain appellants’ complaint by virtue of the authority vested in it by 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281 and 2284. This Court has never held that a district court is without jurisdiction to entertain a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw