CITY OF AMARILLO

v.

COPELAND

Citator

Cited By

• Lavere C. and Doris J. Baughman v. Bradford Coal Co., Inc., 592 F.2d 215 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …§ 1365(b)(1)(B). Generally, the word “court” in a statute is held to refer only to the tribunals of the judiciary and not to those of an executive agency with quasi-judicial powers. United States v. Frantz, 220 F. 2d 123, 125 (3rd Cir.), cert. den., 349 U.S. 954, 75 S.Ct. 883, 99 L.Ed. 1278 (1955); Nelson v. Real Estate Comm’n, 35 Md.App. 334, 370 A. 2d 608, 614 (1977); Department of State v. Spano, 1 Pa.Cmwlth. 240, 274 A. 2d 563 (1971). Nevertheless, an administrative board may be a “court” if its powers…
• Osborn v. United States, 322 F.2d 835 (5th Cir. 1963)
  …of his government. One convicted in a court martial is just as effectively deprived of his liberty as one convicted in the district comff of the United States.” Accord, Roberson v. United States, 1954, 124 F.Supp. 857, 129 Ct.Cl. 581, cert. denied, 349 U.S. 954, 75 S.Ct. 883, 99 L.Ed. 1279 (1955). The armed services today are vastly different from the small standing army and navy of professionals formerly characteristic of the country’s military services. In a war we are a nation in arms. Even in time of…
• George v. Vincin V. the United States, 468 F.2d 930 (Ct. Cl. 1972)
  …The unjust conviction statute has always been strictly construed. Osborn v. United States, 322 F. 2d 835 (5th Cir. 1963); Smith v. United States, 168 Ct.Cl. 242 (1964); Roberson v. United States, 124 F.Supp. 857, 129 Ct.Cl. 581 (1954), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 954, 75 S.Ct. 883, 99 L.Ed. 1279 (1955); Roberts v. United States, 126 Ct.Cl. 947 (1953); Weiss v. United States, 91 F.Supp. 742, 120 Ct.Cl. 1 (1950); Ekberg v. United States, 76 F.Supp. 99, 110 Ct.Cl. 267 (1948); Hadley v. United States, 66 F.Supp. 140…