PAINTERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 22, BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS, DECORATORS & PAPERHANGERS OF AMERICA (A. F. L.), ET AL.
v.
AUSTIN ET AL.

U.S. | 1955-04-04
No. 577
348 U.S. 979 Supreme Court of the United States (1955) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Michigan.

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by 28 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Capitol Enters., Inc. v. City OF Chicago, 260 F.2d 670 (7th Cir. 1958)
    …ants as their main authority for resisting reversal of the judgment below. It is true, as respondents’ brief shows, the United States Supreme Court did dismiss that appeal, but for the reason, as we ascertained, “for want of a final judgment.” 1955, 348 U.S. 979, 75 S.Ct. 572, 99 L.Ed. 763. All this goes further, because that case, American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Chicago, was reversed and remanded (3 Ill.2d 334, 353, 121 N.E. 2d 585) for trial and when it reached the Illinois trial judge he held t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw