WARD TRANSPORT, INC. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
WARD TRANSPORT, INC. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
348 U.S. 979
Supreme Court of the United States (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Capitol Enters., Inc. v. City OF Chicago, 260 F.2d 670 (7th Cir. 1958)…ants as their main authority for resisting reversal of the judgment below. It is true, as respondents’ brief shows, the United States Supreme Court did dismiss that appeal, but for the reason, as we ascertained, “for want of a final judgment.” 1955, 348 U.S. 979, 75 S.Ct. 572, 99 L.Ed. 763. All this goes further, because that case, American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Chicago, was reversed and remanded (3 Ill.2d 334, 353, 121 N.E. 2d 585) for trial and when it reached the Illinois trial judge he held t…