WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

v.

LEE OPTICAL OF OKLAHOMA, INC. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Williams v. Georgia, 349 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1955)
  …8 U. S. 854. Since the attorney appointed by the Georgia court advised the Clerk of this Court that he would not be in a position to present oral argument before this Court,4 we appointed [*381] amicus curiae to present argument on Williams’ behalf. 348 U. S. 957. In his brief on behalf of the State before the State Supreme Court, the Solicitor General of Fulton County-had urged, inter alia, that there was no showing of a denial of equal protection in this case.5 On oral argument [*382] here, however, the S…
• THE Tank Steamer Fort Fetterman v. S.C. State Hwy. Dep't, 278 F.2d 921 (4th Cir. 1960)
  …he case. Faced with this finding of the trial court, approved upon appeal, we must now examine the findings and conclusions on remand in light of the decision in McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20, modification denied, 348 U.S. 957, 75 S.Ct. 447, 99 L.Ed. 748. Unless the judgment below is clearly erroneous, we are bound by the findings of the District Court. We do not suggest that, in applying the Pennsylvania rule, a court may not, to some extent, speculate as to [*926] what…