WRATHER ET AL.
v.
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ET AL.
WRATHER ET AL.
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ET AL.
348 U.S. 898
Supreme Court of the United States (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shenk v. The Zoning Comm'n OF the Dist. OF Columbia, 440 F.2d 295 (D.C. Cir. 1971)…ct of Columbia, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 72, 190 F. 2d 25 (1951); Leventhal v. District of Columbia, 69 App.D.C. 229, 100 F. 2d 94 (1938); American University v. Prentiss, 113 F.Supp. 389 (D.D.C.1953), aff’d, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 204, 214 F. 2d 282, cert. denied, 348 U.S. 898, 75 S.Ct. 217, 99 L.Ed. 705 (1954); Diedrich v. Zoning Commission, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 265, 393 F. 2d 666 (1968). Recognizing this limitation upon the scope of its review the district court found on the record before it “that the denial of the applicat…
-
Gerstenfeld v. Jett, 374 F.2d 333 (D.C. Cir. 1967)…legislative capacity, is not required to limit its decision making to evidence within the hearing record. See American Univ. v. Prentiss, D.C., 113 F.Supp. 389, affirmed, Prentiss v. American Univ., 94 U.S.App. D.C. 204, 214 F. 2d 282, cert, denied, 348 U.S. 898, 75 S.Ct. 217, 99 L.Ed. 705 (1954); Garrity v. District of Columbia, 66 App.D.C. 256, 86 F. 2d 207 (1936). Our scope of review of a Zoning Commission determination was spelled out in Lewis v. District of Columbia, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 72, 74, 190 F. 2d…