METRAKOS

v.

CLEVELAND UNION TERMINALS CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …Ohio R. Co., 358 U. S. 881. B.. Where lower court sustained a jury verdict for the employer: Jones v. Illinois Terminal R. Co., 347 U. S. 956. Conser v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R. Co., 348 U. S. 828. Metrakos v. Cleveland Union Terminals Co., 348 U. S. 872. [*23] Kane v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Corp., 348 U. S. 943. Daulton v. Southern Pacific Co., 352 U. S. 1005. Burch v. Reading Co., 353 U. S. 965. Brinkley v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 358 U. S. 865. Masterson v. New York Central R. Co., post…
• VAN Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd., 760 F.2d 481 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …’s dangers, the supplier need not warn employees. See Lockett v. General Electric Co., 376 F.Supp. 1201 (E.D.Pa. 1974) , aff'd mem., 511 F. 2d 1394 (3d Cir. 1975) ; Hopkins v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 212 F. 2d 623 (3d Cir.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 872, 75 S.Ct. 108, 99 L.Ed. 686 (1954). These cases are inapposite for three reasons. First, they involve the issue of a duty to warn rather than the issue of causation, and defendants here do not dispute on appeal that they had a duty to warn. Second,…
• Sterling Jackson v. Coast Paint & Lacquer Co., 499 F.2d 809 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …owledge and understanding of painting contractors is irrelevant. The general principle can be illustrated by comparing to this case two cases relied upon by defendant: Hopkins v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 212 F. 2d 623 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 872, 75 S.Ct. 108, 99 L.Ed. 686 (1954), and Jacobson v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp., 409 F. 2d 1263 (9th Cir. 1969). In Hopkins plaintiff’s decedent was killed when he placed a stick of dynamite manufactured by the defendant into a freshly drilled hole i…