MOORE

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Shelton v. United States Bd. OF Parole, 388 F.2d 567 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …3 L.Ed.2d 801 (1965). . See, e.g., Avellino v. United States, 330 F. 2d 490 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 922, 13 L.Ed.2d 336 (1964); Smith v. Blackwell, 367 F. 2d 539 (5th Cir. 1966); Jenkins v. Madigan, 211 F. 2d 904 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 348 U.S. 842, 75 S.Ct. 63, 99 L.Ed. 664 (1954); Sprouse v. Settle, 274 F. 2d 681 (8th Cir. 1960); Za-vada v. Taylor, 285 F. 2d 66 (10th Cir. 1960). . However, since appellant was released on parole, not as a mandatory releasee, it is unnecessary to consider whe…
• United States v. McKINNEY, 427 F.2d 449 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …); Smith v. United States, 273 F. 2d 462, 468 (10th Cir. 1959) (dissenting opinion by Murrah, Chief Judge), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 846, 80 S.Ct. 1619, 4 L.Ed.2d 1729 (1960); State of Ohio v. Hashmall, 160 Ohio St. 565, 117 N.E. 2d 606, cert. denied, 348 U.S. 842, 75 S.Ct. 62, 99 L.Ed. 664 (1954). The District Judge will have opportunity to reconsider the sentence upon the remand for that purpose. We affirm the conviction. We remand for reconsideration of the sentence, but we retain jurisdiction to conside…
• Morrissey v. Lou V. Brewer, 443 F.2d 942 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …onfinement in the legal custody and under the control of the warden within the specified prison bounds outside the prison, for the confinement within the prison adjudged by the court.” Jenkins v. Madigan, 211 F. 2d 904, 906 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 842, 75 S.Ct. 63, 99 L.Ed. 664 (1954). The legal procedures providing for parole are a part of the legislative function of creating a penological system, which encompasses, of course, rules to govern the care and discipline of inmates. Parole does not e…