KUCZYNSKI
v.
BURKE, WARDEN
KUCZYNSKI
BURKE, WARDEN
348 U.S. 837
Supreme Court of the United States (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
REX Chainbelt Inc. v. Harco Prods., Inc., 512 F.2d 993 (9th Cir. 1975)…ding that “Nordbak” was a staple commodity. It is well settled that the mere addition of extenders to a staple article does not make the article nonstaple. Dr. Salsbury’s Laboratories v. I. D. Russell Co., 212 F. 2d 414 (8th Cir. 1954), cert. denied 348 U.S. 837, 75 S.Ct. 50, 99 L.Ed. 660 (1954). There the court held that the addition of other dilutive ingredients to a staple article of commerce does not cause the article “to lose its characteristics as a common raw material.” (212 F. 2d p. 416) This is par…