GLOVER ET AL.
v.
OFFICERS AND MINISTER OF THE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF HARTFORD, KNOWN AS THE CENTER CHURCH
GLOVER ET AL.
OFFICERS AND MINISTER OF THE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF HARTFORD, KNOWN AS THE CENTER CHURCH
348 U.S. 825
Supreme Court of the United States (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
United States v. Lloyde W. Richmond, Jr., 700 F.2d 1183 (8th Cir. 1983)…. United States v. Pintar, supra, 630 F. 2d at 1275; United States v. McCarty, 611 F. 2d 220, 222 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 930, 100 S.Ct. 1319, 63 L.Ed.2d 764 (1980); Nilva v. United States, 212 F. 2d 115, 121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 825, 75 S.Ct. 40, 99 L.Ed. 650 (1954). Moreover, because conspiracy by its very nature is often not susceptible of proof by direct evidence, the existence of an agreement may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, including the conduct of the alleged…
-
United States v. Pintar, 630 F.2d 1270 (8th Cir. 1980)…tates v. Hutchinson, 488 F. 2d 484, 490 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 915, 94 S.Ct. 2616, 41 L.Ed.2d 219 (1974), and may consist of nothing more than tacit understanding, Nilva v. United States, 212 F. 2d 115, 121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 825, 75 S.Ct. 40, 99 L.Ed. 650 (1954). The existence of the agreement may be shown by circumstantial evidence, including the conduct of the conspirators and any attending circumstances, particularly circumstances indicating that the defendants “acted…
-
Schneider v. United States, 459 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1972)…which prohibits traveling in interstate commerce to promote certain illegal activity, including gambling, which is in violation of the laws of the state in which it occurs). See, Nilva v. United States, 212 F. 2d 115 (8th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 825, 75 S. Ct. 40, 99 L.Ed. 650 (1954) (upholding 15 U.S.C. § 1171-77, which prohibits the transportation of gambling devices into any state, but provides that a state may exempt itself from the act); Turf Center, Inc. v. United States, 325 F. 2d 793 (9…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence