BERTEL ET AL.
v.
PANAMA TRANSPORT CO. ET AL.
BERTEL ET AL.
PANAMA TRANSPORT CO. ET AL.
346 U.S. 834
Supreme Court of the United States (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Caradelis v. Refineria Panama, 384 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1967)…Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 945, 87 S.Ct. 318, 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966); Spanos v. The Lily, 261 F. 2d 214 (4th Cir., 1958); Kulukundis v. Strand, 202 F. 2d 708 (9th Cir., 1953); Bertel v. Panama Transport Co., 202 F. 2d 247 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 834, 74 S.Ct. 35, 98 L.Ed. 356 (1953). . In San Pedro Compañía Armadoras, S.A., supra, we observed that where the only evidence supporting a finding of contributory negligence was response to written interrogatories, the clearly erroneous rule “does no…
-
Cimarron Coal Corp. v. Dist. NO. 23, 416 F.2d 844 (6th Cir. 1969)…law authorized injunctive relief to enjoin even peaceful picketing when circumstances indicate that its purpose is unlawful, citing Blue Boar Cafeteria Co. v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Local 181, 254 S.W. 2d 335 (Ky. Ct.App.1952), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 834, 74 S.Ct. 41, 98 L.Ed. 357 (1953). Since, however, the Norris-LaGuardia Act is the decisive standard as to federal jurisdiction (See Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co., 303 U.S. 323, 58 S.Ct. 578, 82 L.Ed. 872 (1938)), we have no need to determine this iss…