LOBER ET AL., EXECUTORS,

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427 (U.S. 1953)
  …her an agreement to arbitrate a future controversy is a “condition, stipulation, or provision binding any person acquiring any security to waive compliance with any provision” of the Securities Act which § 146 declares “void.” We granted certiorari, 345 U. S. 969, to review this important and novel federal question affecting both the Securities Act and the United States Arbitration Act. Cf. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D’Alene Mines Corp., 312 U. S. 38, 40. As the margin agreement in the light of the complaint evid…
• Lober v. United States, 346 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1953)
  …the properties conveyed. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had reached a contrary result where the circumstances were substantially the same, in Hays’ Estate v. Commissioner, 181 F. 2d 169, 172-174. Because of this conflict, we granted certiorari. 345 U. S. 969. [*337] Petitioners stress a factual difference between this and the Holmes case. The Holmes trust instrument provided that if a beneficiary died before expiration of the trust his children succeeded to his interest, but if he died without children,…
• Haviv Schieber v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 461 F.2d 1078 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …iscretion in refusing to reopen a deportation proceeding. LaFranca v. I. N. S., 413 F. 2d 686, 690 (2 Cir. 1969); Maturo v. I. N. S., 404 F. 2d 337 (2 Cir. 1968); United States ex rel. James v. Shaughnessy, 202 F. 2d 519, 521 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 969 (1953); United States ex rel. Adel v. Shaughnessy, 183 F. 2d 371 (2 Cir. 1950). Our independent examination of the record before us satisfies us that the Board did not abuse its discretion and that it applied the proper criteria in denying petition…