SCARLETT

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Voris v. Eikel, 346 U.S. 328 (U.S. 1953)
  …istrict of Texas reversed his decision and enjoined further payments, 101 F. Supp. 963. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed by a divided court, 200 F. 2d 724. This Court granted certiorari to review the interpretation of the statute. 345 U. S. 955. The facts as disclosed by the record and found by the Deputy Commissioner are as follows: The claimant, Earl Porter, was a stevedore employed by the Southern Stevedoring and Contracting Company. On December 19, 1949, while he was working in the h…
• Howell Chevrolet Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 346 U.S. 482 (U.S. 1953)
  …on over a local Ford auto [*483] mobile dealer. Labor Board v. Bill Daniels, Inc., 202 F. 2d 579. We granted certiorari to consider the single question presented by petitioner — whether the Act is applicable to retail automobile dealers like Howell. 345 U. S. 955. Sections 10 (a) and 2 (7) of the Labor Act empower the Board to prevent “any person” from adversely “affecting commerce” by unfair labor practices “tending to lead to a labor dispute burdening or obstructing commerce or the free flow of commerce.”…
• Fed. Power Comm'n v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 347 U.S. 239 (U.S. 1954)
  …le expenses for the reason that the Commission considered those rights no longer existent. The Court of Appeals held precisely the contrary and we granted certiorari because of the important bearing of the. decision upon the Federal Water Power Act. 345 U. S. 955. The immediate issue thus presented is whether the licensee’s amortization reserve under § 10 (d), for the period from March 2, 1941, through December 31, 1946, should be $914,432.04 or $515,432.04.8 That difference of $399,000 is one-half of the $…