HILDERBRAND

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Northwest Bancorporation v. Bd. OF Governors OF the Fed. Reserve Sys., 303 F.2d 832 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …it is an allowable judgment which we cannot disturb (Emphasis supplied.) See Gray v. Powell, 1941, 314 U.S. 402, 412, 62 S.Ct. 326, 86 L.Ed. 301; Fahey v. O’Melveny & Myers, 9 Cir., 1952, 200 F. 2d 420, 472-474, certiorari denied Mallonee v. Fahey, 345 U.S. 952, 73 S.Ct. 863, 97 L.Ed. 1374. The argument, made orally by counsel for the petitioner, to the effect that the present decision of the Board results in giving a competitor holding company “a vested interest in a town” is not persuasive. It may well…
• Fid. Fin. Corp. v. Fed. Home Loan Bank OF SAN Francisco, 792 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …& Myers, 200 F. 2d 420, 446, 454 (9th Cir.1952) (ruling, pre-Jackson, that Federal Home Loan Banks are “governmental banking agencies” in the context of determining that the banks do not have due process rights against the government), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 952, 73 S.Ct. 866, 97 L.Ed. 1374 (1953). We need not resolve this issue, however, for we find that the district court’s second ground clearly disposes of Fidelity’s procedural due process claim. B. Fidelity argues that it had a protectible property in…
• United States v. State TAX Comm'n, 481 F.2d 963 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …issed on motion of counsel for petitioners sub nom. Martin v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 305 U.S. 666, 59 S.Ct. 363, 83 L.Ed. 432 (1938). See Fahey v. O’Melveny, 200 F. 2d 420 (9th Cir. 1952), cert. denied sub nom. Willhoit v. Fahey et al., 345 U.S. 952, 73 S.Ct. 866, 97 L.Ed. 1374 (1953). The federal associations are closely affiliated with their district federal home loan bank (there are twelve nationally), which may provide them credit. The chairman of the Home Loan Bank Board states in an affi…