A. B. MOTORS, INC. ET AL.

v.

FREEHILL, DIRECTOR OF PRICE STABILIZATION

Citator

Cited By (63 total)

• Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752 (U.S. 1984)
  …A9 1969); Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 109 U. S. App. D. C. 170, 174, 284 F. 2d 599, 603 (1960), rev’d on other grounds, 368 U. S. 464 (1962); Nelson Radio & Supply Co. v. Motorola, Inc., 200 F. 2d 911, 914 (CA5 1952), cert. denied, 345 U. S. 925 (1953). Accord, Report of the Attorney General’s National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws 31 (1955). At the same time, many courts have created an exception for corporate officers acting on their own behalf. See, e. g., H & B Equipment Co. v.…
• Gordon v. United States, 438 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …Cir. 1959) cert. den. 362 U.S. 928, 80 S.Ct. 756, 4 L.Ed.2d 747; Gilmore v. United States, 256 F. 2d 565 (5th Cir. 1958); Portomene v. United States, 221 F. 2d 582 (5th Cir. 1955); United States v. Conforti, 200 F. 2d 365 (7th Cir. 1957) cert. den. 345 U.S. 925, 73 S.Ct. 782, 97 L.Ed. 1356; Sorrentino v. United States, 163 F. 2d 627 (9th Cir. 1947); 76 A.L.R.2d 262. . See United States v. McCarthy, 292 F.Supp. 937, 940 (S.D.N.Y.1968) wherein the court said: The purpose of a bill of particulars is to aid…
• Quality Foods de Centro Am., S.A. v. Latin Am. Agribusiness Dev. Corp., S.A., 711 F.2d 989 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …d the elements of the various antitrust claims.” The court also noted that plaintiffs were unlikely to state a claim for relief under any conspiracy in light of Nelson Radio & Supply Co. v. Motorola, Inc., 200 F. 2d 911 (5th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 925, 73 S.Ct. 783, 97 L.Ed. 1356 (1953). The court further dismissed plaintiffs’ pendent claims because “the twenty common law counts will require proof of facts, additional to those required to prove the antitrust claim.” In October 1981, Quality Fo…

  ← 1 / 2 →