NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

v.

GAMBLE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. California, 381 U.S. 139 (U.S. 1965)
  …g of the waters inside a line encompassing the islands off the shore of southern California, some as far as 50 miles out.4 The Special Master’s Report, generally favoring the position of the United States, was filed with this Court in November 1952, 344 U. S. 872. He adopted as his criteria for defining inland waters those applied by the United States [*144] in the conduct of its foreign affairs as of the date of the California decree, October 27, 1947 — in particular, a rule that only a bay having a closing…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Zborowski, 271 F.2d 661 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …onage activities generally, all leads which the jury can obtain to identify those who have at any time been engaged therein are material. See Vetterli v. United States, 9 Cir., 198 F. 2d 291, judgment vacated and case remanded for resentencing 1952, 344 U.S. 872, 73 S.Ct. 175, 97 L.Ed. 675. Zborowski’s testimony was material to the grand jury investigation; his statement that he did not know Jack Soble had a tendency to dissuade the grand jury from making further inquiry into that phase of Zborowski’s N.K.V…
• United States v. Mannie Goldberg, 290 F.2d 729 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …value as belongs to any testimonial assertion under the circumstances,” 4 Wigmore, Evidence (3d ed. 1940), pp. 5-6, applies. Hence, as said in Vetterli v. United States, 9 Cir., 1952, 198 F. 2d 291, 293, vacated and remanded on other grounds, 1952, 344 U.S. 872, 73 S.Ct. 175, 97 L.Ed. 675, “We do not believe an extra-judicial admission made by an accused is insufficient as corroboration simply because it is such.” With respect to Count II, appellant relies on the statement in Umbria- [*735] co v. United S…